Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Under review
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 1, 2024

Controller ownership: backend disks and data - new architecture and/or implementation

Hello Product and Development teams,

Over Latin America we faced some situation where customers did see (a lot) value in solutions where multiple controllers can work together, to minimize downtime, to achieve some workload requirements and so on. This requirement is normally achieved today by vendors that offer active-active symmetric architecture.

Our current architecture, thinking on SAN Volume Controller for example, each I/O Group have the ownership of their backend capacity, therefore, if for some reason both controllers do fail, all data managed by this I/O group become unavailable (until problem is fixed). The PBHA or even Hyperswap imply to have some limitations to the environment or even cluster/scale-out.

My main idea here, after some discussions with colleagues and customers, is to propose an idea to IBM have a solution that can desegregated the backend to be managed by only one I/O Group.

One example, a future release of SVC have the ability to share with some other SVC the same backend in a way that if an I/O group entirely fail, the other I/O Group still have the ability to access data transparently and without to implement any other topology, like PBHA. If customer need more capacity, more shelves of disks can be installed, if customer need more processing power, more controller (I/O groups) can be installed.

According last report of Magic Quadrant of Gartner, HPE, one of leaders of the report, have this implementation or function as a strength - Gartner: "HPE’s four-node 32-core CPU Alletra MP SDS disaggregated architecture allows customers to cost-effectively scale platform capacity and performance independent of each other, with a 100% data availability guarantee."

Thinking that IBM will have new products some point in the future (GEN5 platform and EDSFF disks) and I believe the next gen platform will have NVMe disk expansion, maybe we can use this moment to bring this feature to IBM solutions and combine with all other impressive features and functions that we do have.

Thanks.

Idea priority Low