This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Many modern OpenShift workloads are doing application level HA with deployment across AZ with transaction replication. The most prominant of these from the IBM SW portfolio are CP4I and CP4BA. For these workloads, their deployment with Fusion Data Foundation creates a 3x the storage overhead/cost. In these cases, the application writing three copies and for each of these writes, FDF create three copies. Fusion Data Foundation defaults to three replicas, which works well for applications that are not doing application level HA/Replication. The sales/technical teams driving the sales of the applications recognize the benefit from Fusion's Advance Data Protection and HA/DR services but the infrastructure cost created by the 3x overhead makes positioning IBM Storage Fusion with these workloads cost prohibitive. Today these workloads are electing to use cloud native storage service.
Ideally, Fusion Data Foundation needs to support a multiple (1,2 or 3) replica deployment model for both single and multi zone AZ deployments. This capability would put Storage Fusion in a leading position versus our competitors from both a capability and cost perspective. For example:
Single AZ:
Lowest cost and lowest protection: 1 replica, < 3 FDF nodes
Highest cost and highest protection: 3 replicas, >= 3 FDF nodes
Multi AZ
Lowest cost and lowest protection: 1 replica per AZ, 1 FDF node/AZ
Highest cost and highest protection: 3 replicas, >= 3 FDF nodes
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
The ask is to allow platform engineers to select an option for how Fusion would handle replication. In the case of integration products where they do their own replication, it makes sense to acknowledge that and disable additional storage-level replicas. The expectation is for each cluster to have its own setting. Deployed on HCI, each cluster could have different workloads with different replication requirements.