This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.
I have been thinking about this a bit. The main value of decommission node is the simple management of the various steps of decommissioning a node, most notably the graceful expiration of backups. I am speculating if the best way to keep the value of this command for all node types while still to provide extra protection is to treat "known good" node types (b/a client, VE, domino, MSEX and MSQL) one way, and for any other node type offer a chance to cancel out or provide a expiration period. Additionally, for known good types, any setting retention period lower than a pre-specified period (such as 7 days) can generate the same option. My logic is this: While we know Oracle and DB2 self-manage their retention, there is no reason any custom node type or even a standard node type could not be used with an application that self-manages it retention via the active/inactive flag. By checking against a white list of node types that work well with decommission AND checking for a short retention we can provide 2 safety checks while still allowing the value of decommission node to be maintained.