Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 26, 2022

New Fileset Attribute to Ignore Special Owning Group and Everyone Permissions

To allow applications outside our control to function properly when storing data in Spectrum Scale file and directory owners must be granted implicit control and have the ability to run chmod against files and directories they own. Depending on the ACLs set at the top of project trees this can allow users to give away more access to data then is desired by the project administrators. Ignoring the group and other mode bits when doing authorization checks as is done with the AFS filesystem would solve this concern.
Idea priority Low
  • Admin
    THOMAS O'BRIEN
    Reply
    |
    Nov 30, 2023

    Thank you for submitting this enhancement request. This is not in the Storage Scale Roadmap in the foreseeable future.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 26, 2022

    A directory has the following acls:
    #owner:igb
    #group:users
    special:owner:rwxc:FileInherit:DirInherit
    special:group:----:FileInherit:DirInherit
    special:everyone:----:FileInherit:DirInherit

    group:eclipz_admin:rwxc:FileInherit:DirInherit
    group:eclipz_sf5_members:r-x-:FileInherit:DirInherit
    user:igb:rwx-:FileInherit:DirInherit

    I now run:

    chmod 755 .

    The new acls are:
    #owner:igb
    #group:users
    special:owner:rwx-
    special:group:r-x-
    special:everyone:r-x-

    special:owner:rwxc:FileInherit:DirInherit:InheritOnly
    special:group:----:FileInherit:DirInherit:InheritOnly
    special:everyone:----:FileInherit:DirInherit:InheritOnly|
    group:eclipz_admin:rwxc:FileInherit:DirInherit
    group:eclipz_sf5_members:r-x-:FileInherit:DirInherit
    user:igb:rwx-:FileInherit:DirInherit

    Now any group: or user: acls we had to control access become irrelevant. There are many applications that calls the chmod command. If we prevent users from running the chmod command on the fileset, such applications will fail. This feature request will allow them to run successfully while maintaining the security implememented through any existing group: and/or user: acls