Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS)

Showing 526

Export map support for mmcesdr

The mmcesdr command that is used in 4.2 or later to set up protocols (NFS, SMB and Object) disaster recovery via AFM allows you to specify the secondary target with the --ip-list parameter as: “a comma separated list of public IP addresses on the ...
almost 9 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 3 Not under consideration

Writable snapshots on Spectrum scale for DR testing

Customers are requesting writable snapshots on Spectrum Scale in order to simulate DR testings.
almost 9 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 3 Not under consideration

GPFS FPO weighting algorithms

for GPFS FPO, all NSDs within a failure group have the same weighting regardless of the number of disks or characteristics of those disks, Please can you add a feature to enable weighting to be applied. for example if one FG only contains 5 NSDs a...
about 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

Parallel AFM cache fileset prefetch controls

Need ability to direct AFM prefetch operation (e.g. mmafmctl <new fs> prefetch -j <cache fileset> --home-inode-file <mmapplypolicy file list from old fs> ) to run multiple threads from a single gateway node in parallel for prefet...
about 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 3 Not under consideration

OSX 10.8+ client : GPFS protocol over IP

Performance improvements over NFS3/4 and SMB2
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

Ability to add and remove parallel threads / nodes to a currently executing policy

Increase or decrease the processing of a running policy on the fly
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

Globally accessible and coherent cache

A cached block is cached on all nodes and hence accessible from all nodes
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

NDMP support in native GPFS

GPFS does not natively support NDMP.
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

[BDA] Cache control via runtime policy engine

If caching could be controlled by the policy engine, the user could intelligently control that valuable resource with respect to their known workloads / data types.
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

Need to be able to trace GPFS with small overhead

The available trace feature of GPFS requires lots of system resource, to be able to enable such trace on a production system, a light weight trace option is required.
over 10 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration