Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 3, 2019

Improving offload hardware requirement efficiency

Hi,
Currently, when an SPP customer would like to have a copy on tapes, he has 2 alternatives:
1. copy mode - to have additional storage space in the ISP server (as directory container) to allow incremental copies. that requires twice the capacity in terms of storage. so if the customer is 2PB (Vsnap aggregate capacity for a single site), then the customer will need to purchase 2 additional PB. that puts SPP out of the game in the customer's eyes when the competition starts with alternative products. that's killing the deal in terms of ROI immediately.

2. the second option is to use Archive, which can only run once a week, and takes full, undeduped copy of the VSNAP pool to tapes,that means the same customer with 2PB of data will need to allocate for each archive operation hundreds of tapes, insert them to the library an so on every week. comparing to the alternative competition which allows taking a single version point in time copy to tape (instead of the entire pool). that is also a deal killer in terms of trying to get into new customers.

Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 25, 2020

    This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.