This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
When configuring additional copies with offload on TSM, you can only use container pools for storage, but container pools cannot be migrated to tape. Since we only use all-flash SAN storage, this is a very costly solution.
For our customer, we need these additional copies monthly for 15 months in TSM container pools and the archive annually for 10 years. The only other way we could do to send data to tape is to archive everything monthly for 10 years, but this would use even more space since it would be 10 years for everything, including the monthly copies.
When configuring additional copies on the TSM repository server, we learned that these can only be offloaded to container pools. Due to the high cost of our flash storage, it would be very helpful to be able to make additional copies on tape instead of container pools.
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Absolutely, the additional Copys to Container Pools are very cost intensive. Also there is a Problem with Reports about Data going to Container Pools for single Server, The Costs of Data in Container Pools can not be set for single Servers, Conainer Pools are a big black box whre no accounting is possible.
IBM has evaluated the request, and has determined that it can not be implemented at this time. We will review this request and update it in the future or a new one may be submitted in 6 months. This idea can still be voted on and votes will be taken into account.
SPP provides SLA options to archive data to SP Tape for long term retention, as an alternative..