IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Spectrum Protect (Server)

Showing 922

Ensure LAN_FREE when NEXTpool is used

In a situation where a customer sets up a policy so that data may go to 2 different storage pools, and uses the MAXSIZE parameter of a storage pool to determine where data is placed, the ability to access the 2nd storage via LAN_FREE is only deter...
about 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

Occupancy not reporting on objects stored in the TSM database

The Query Occupancy or Select from Occupancy commands do not report on backup objects stored within the TSM database.
about 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

DRP TSM :

Some customers save the VM data on tape. They use the stgpool VMCTLFILESTGPOOL (control file) to accelerate the restore. Macro "VMCTLFILESTGPOOL.VOLUMES.DESTROYED" should be added in "RECOVERY.SCRIPT.DISASTER.RECOVERY.MODE".
about 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 3 Not under consideration

DRP TSM : modify the script to restore the DB

the commands - in RECOVERY.SCRIPT.DISASTER.RECOVERY.MODE file - to restore tsm instance after crash, are for TSM v5.In TSM v6, to restore after a major crash, it's needed to create a new TSM instance. The TSMDB1 database is dropped, just before th...
about 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 3 Is a defect

Node Replication process

Hi,a backup process is preempted by Node Replication process. This is incomprehensible. Why Node Replication process has a higher priority than backup ? In this way, backup stg process should also have a higher priority.Thank you.
about 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Is a defect

Bandwidth throttling between two TSM servers during the "node replication"

The customer want to have the possibility to have a flexible bandwith during the node replication with a secodary TSM according to their needs.
over 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

deduplication sequential pool

Hello, After 14 month of TSM deduplicaiton tests with terrible Performancewe would wish to have deduplication volumes on device class=disk. At the Moment only devclass = sequential is supported.
over 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

Make the time interval for "ANR3654W Inventory file expiration processing did not run in the previous 24 hours" configurable

The message ANR3654W is shown even if an expire inventory schedule was executed every day at 4pm, because the detailed time frame including seconds is checked for the message. The request is either check not on detailed second (maybe a minute or 5...
about 5 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

TSM Client Pre/Post

Reporting on the TSM Server of the status of TSM client pre/post schedule actions
over 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 3 Not under consideration

SSL/LTS Certificate revocation

SSL/LTS Certificate revocation The product should contain a mechanism which can deal with certificate revocation in a sensible way. Currently TSM will allow the use of a revoked certificate.
over 10 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.