This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Today I found that a number of vm's did not backup snapshots to the (container based) storage pool.
This happened before and points to the error:
ANS9351E Data was not available on server and was skipped. Processing snapshot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When checking the server I try:
Query container state=unavailable
-----------------------------------------------
And found 26 unavailable containers.
Usually this happens because of some communications failure between the server and the container storage, which are in different buildings/vlans.
Now I have to run on each container:
Audit container XXXX
------------------------------
Wait some minute or two and run the next one.
To "automate" this, make a script, copy the list of bad containers to notepad++, edit the file, so it looks like:
update script auditfix "audit container XXXYYY001.dcf wait=yes" line=011
update script auditfix "audit container XXXYYY002.dcf wait=yes" line=021
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
run this in the tsm admin window and then run:
run auditfix
----------------
Here my proposal:
Fix "audit container" to allow:
Audit container state=unavailable wait=yes
or:
Audit container action=SCANUNAVAILABLE
Or:
Query container state=unavailable audit=yes
------------------------------------------------------------
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Thanks, David, the team has reviewed this and has decided the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.
Dear Juan,
Got this from IBM
I have no knowledge of the IBM inner proceedings, but I hope you can progress on this "idea" even without open case...
Best wishes
David de Leeuw
Case Updated
26 October 2022, 05:26 AM CDT
TS011039814
Severity 3
Spectrum Protect automatic scan and fix of unavailable containers for Spectrum Product servers
IBM Support - 26 October 2022, 05:26 AM CDT
Hi
You have opened "idea" under SPF-I-3144 about these suggested changes.
The 'idea' is outside of scope of support and is for development to review and decide, using the 'idea' tool.
Why open the case here? Can we close the case off as we cannot provide any help here about your suggestion for command improvements
Thx
Dave
Dear Juan Carlos Jimenez Fuentes
As you requested I opened a case at IBM under number TS011039814
I have no easy access to the case management. So please write your findings, progress, questions also here. Or send by mail to david@bgu.ac.il
Thanks
David de Leeuw
Hello, is there a case open for this? If not, we suggest opening one so that we can look deeper into it.
Wouldn't it be nice to have a audit container * wherestate=unavailable action=scanall
Also a way of findinfg and fixing damaged containers like audit container * wheredamaged=yes action=removedamaged