This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Hi Stefanj,
my request stems from a real case, in which the customer uses an excel sheet to maintain the state of used space in each of his DS8000s. Based on the available space (expressed in extents), it is then decided how many logical volumes can still be defined without exceeding the residual capacity.
In the DS8000 it is essential to know the number of extents if you work in a mainframe environment (CKD), because volumes are not allocated in GiB as in an open environment where an extent is equivalent to 1 GiB (or 16 MiB in case of small extents). In the mainframe environment, an extent is equivalent to 1113 cylinders (or 21 cylinders in the case of small extents). I hope I have clarified.
Extents come in two different sizes, so would probably also need to have the extent size available.
I don't quite understand what advantage it is to see "number of extents" over seeing the actual capacity value, if, as you say, the user still has to do additional computations with that. Whatever the user is trying to figure out, wouldn't it be better to see THAT value in the report, rather than a "number of extents" that needs to be processed further?