This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Storage
Product - IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller (SVC) / Spectrum Virtualize
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Tivoli
Product family - Storage
Product - IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller (SVC) / Spectrum Virtualize
Thanks for the inputs, Ilja, we have move the status into an area where we will seek to bring this option into as near a release as possible.
Hi there,
any change you might give me a comment on the current status and what you have decided to do with this request?
Cheers, Ilja
Hi,
using the syslog method would make the most sense IMHO. A separate syslog server/receiver configuration panel for audit records would be a valid option as well. I see no reason why this would need to be a different protocol, udp/tcp 514 (default syslog) would seem fine.
Integration into the current syslog event stream would be an acceptable option too.
Our central solution is HP ArcSight, which uses Common Event Format (you know that format : http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/igsec/v1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.guardium91.doc%2Fappendices%2Ftopics%2Fcef_mapping.html) but I respect this format might not be suitable for other IBM Storwize users. I consider default syslog format a requirement, the CEF format is an added bonus.
I hope this answers your question or validates your conclusion from this RFE.
Cheers.
We recognize that you want to send audit logs to an external receiver for a central solution. One such could be the Syslog. However, we just want to validate this is the central solution you are focused on supporting, as that will affect which protocol we'd need to use to implement this.