Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 15, 2026

Southam Cancer Cell Injection Consent Record

PROBLEM: In July 1963 Dr. Chester Southam (Sloan-Kettering Institute / Cornell) injected 22 elderly, chronically ill patients at the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, Brooklyn — many incompetent to consent — under the skin of the thigh with live foreign cancer cells (HeLa). They were told it was a routine skin test; the word "cancer" and the experimental, non-therapeutic purpose were not disclosed. No written consent was attempted. Three junior physicians (Kagan, Leichter, Fersko) refused and reported Southam. The N.Y. Board of Regents found Southam and Mandel guilty of fraud, deceit, and unprofessional conduct; the case reached the courts in Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, 251 N.Y.2d 818 (App. Div. 1964), 206 N.E.2d 338 (1965). Southam's wider HeLa injections ran from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s and covered >600 people, including Ohio State Penitentiary prisoners.

SOLUTION: A Storage Copy Data Management improvement that maintains a cancer-cell injection consent record for hospital research: every injection of a foreign biological agent into a patient, the exact words used to describe it, the written consent (or its absence), the patient's capacity assessment, and every refusal by staff, logged in one auditable ledger — so an injection described as a "routine skin test" is caught by the record, not by three junior doctors risking their careers.

EVIDENCE BASIS: DOCUMENTED — 22 patients injected July 1963; no written consent attempted; "routine skin test" description with no mention of cancer; three physicians' refusal and complaint; N.Y. Board of Regents finding of fraud, deceit, and unprofessional conduct; Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, 251 N.Y.2d 818 (1964), 206 N.E.2d 338 (1965).

Idea priority Low