IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5468

Support Directory Direct-Access-Restore for NDMP

TSM supports Direct Access Restore (DAR) for individual files restored from a NAS filer with NDMP. However, it would speed up restores (and make them much more userfriendly) if Directory Direct Access Restore (DDAR) was supported also.
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

Request local support for storing passwords in a one way hash.

Request local support for storing passwords in a one way hash.
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

Allow for use of two factor authentication in lieu of username/passwrds for TSM

Allow for use of two factor authentication in lieu of username/passwrds for TSM
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

Allow for use of PK certificates for authentication of a TSM client to a TSM server and vice versa.

Allow for use of PK certificates for authentication of a TSM client to a TSM server and vice versa. The certificates could also be used for encrypting communication.
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

new feature for Exchange 2010 Online Archive

I would to restore the ONLINE ARCHIVE MAILBOX, the new feature provided by Exchange 2010; Now we are able to restore this, but only including the restore of the entire database into a RECOVERY DATABASE and after this is only possible with a lot of...
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect for Mail 1 Not under consideration

exclude.archive.dir

Provide an exclude.archive.dir option. Without that exclude all other directories, beside the one which should be archived, are scanned and archived. That is particularly an unwanted behaviour when one want to archive a folder from a NetApp snapsh...
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Backup-Archive Client) 3 Not under consideration

Node replication (Query REPLIcation) is not showing current throughput, remaining objects, ETA information as such.

Node replication (Query REPLIcation) is not showing current throughput, remaining objects, ETA information as such. Our intent is to use this feature for DR testing and an indication would be well appriciated in planning the test itself. If the no...
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

Shouldn't the ITM for TSM agent packages have a separate installer - possibly covering all the agents?

Shouldn't the ITM for TSM agent packages have a separate installer - possibly covering all the agents?
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

You want to control simultaneous access to various directories, as a performance item, such that TSM balances the workload

You want to control simultaneous access to various directories, as a performance item, such that TSM balances the workload across multiple spindles/heads/whatever. This is a request to allow ADMINs to somehow map underlying knowledge to TSM entiti...
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 1 Not under consideration

Reclamation continuation until specified x% reached even if some tapes are not available inside silo.

Reclamation continuation until specified x% reached even if some tapes are not available inside silo.
almost 13 years ago in Storage Protect Family / Spectrum Protect (Server) 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.