This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
CoD has been updated and supports 100TB and 20TB increments.
CoD enhancement targeted for R5.0.1 delivery
I also agree with the request. Perhaps the offering could be altered in one or both of two ways. First, allow the selection of the Feature Codes in "any order" .... so some 100TB features, and some number of 10TB or 20TB features, etc. Today, we are forced to take ten 20TB features, then grow in increments of 100TB.
This causes some odd results with the configuration ( example,... try to configure 690TB or 710TB....you will see big difference in the resulting h/w layout). This partly too because shelves must now be installed in pairs.
Second option might be, as another person has commented, allow for a 'NON-COD' option, and license all the availalbe disk enclosures with the numbers that I specify.
Thanks,
GG
Reviewing with Design team.
I agree with this request, but my proposal is to have the possibility to select CoD or not CoD for the machine. In case you select no-CoD, then the full capacity of the installed drawers are available for use.