This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Storage
Product - Tivoli Storage FlashCopy Manager
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Tivoli
Product family - Storage
Product - Tivoli Storage FlashCopy Manager
Two enhancements are actually required here; part of the following is planned already, other is for the future as "uncommitted candidate"
Currently FCM requires environment variable ORACLE_HOME to be set in the users environment right after logon. We request that FCM should read this value from /etc/oratab so that we can have a single user for multiple Oracle instances.
This part is a reasonable request and we should do this (we have had a work item for this for some time but it did not make the cut for 4.1) but we need to plan this as a work item for a future release as it is not small enough to handle during the defect fix phase of the next FCM release
When the user includes additional file systems (besides the DB files) in a cloning operation, FCM fails if one of these file system has links that point to a file system on a different volume group which is not part of the flashcopy. We request that FCM provides the option to just skip those file systems on a different volume group and complete the cloning operation.
This part should be classified as "Planned for Future Release" and we will plan to address it in the defect fix phase of the 4.1 release.
The first issue is also proposed in the RFE 22651 (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=22651)
WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE? Created on the 2. dec 2011. Nothing has been done!