Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Under review
Workspace Storage Fusion
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 4, 2026

MetroDR and RegionalDR combination

Be able to have a "local" MetroDR pair that also replicates asynchronously to a third cluster using RegionalDR.

This is not available today, as Ramen only supports peering two clusters. Anything that involves more than two clusters is not supported.

We now have a couple of customers that actually need this though.

So far we have advertised clusterHA + RegionalDR as an alternative, but some customers actually need the cluster separation that MetroDR provides in addition to the RegionalDR insurance.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Mar 4, 2026

    This request is a refresh of SPFUS-I-34 that has existed since Apr 27, 2023. Clients around the globe are asking for Metro DR + Regional DR. The description in this idea is a good start but needs more detail to reflect the technical requirements of what the storage cluster is doing versus the application cluster(s) in this metro + regional topology.

    IBM development has documented at lest four potential topologies As of today, we believe topology 1 is available - HCI-1 & HCI-2 are stretched across a metro distance with an added arbiter in metro distance, both storage and application share a single cluster.

    The desire is to start with a replica of how ECE worked (Topology 3) where the storage cluster is stretched across HCI-1 + HCI-2 + arbiter and application clusters are independent, non-hosted clusters on HCI-1 or HCI-2.

    Recently, clients have been demanding Metro DR w/Hosted Clusters (Topology 2) where the storage cluster is stretched like Topology 3 but the application clusters are hosted clusters.