Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 5, 2011

snapdiff to update last backup fields in filespace data

Could you please update the TSM snapdiff client to update the lastbackup information of filespaces when a "query filespace f=d" is issued. This would be the obvious behaviour and would be inline with the documented meaning of the columns

This limitation is documented in document reference number 1433538
at this url
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21433538

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 12, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Storage
    Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Tivoli
    Product family - Storage
    Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 2, 2014

    While we recognize that this is a valid requirement, it has not been a high enough priority considered along with the other work we have been doing. We do not feel that this will become a high enough priority that it will be resolved in the next two years, so we are closing this for now. Thanks for your interest.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 19, 2011

    what you are saying is that a snapdiff backup is not a valid backup? only a monthly full is?
    I think it would be better/safer to:
    For "Include/exclude changes", "delete backup" or "policy changes" to force a create new base eg delete the TSM created snapshot.
    eg
    * TSM snapshot A exists
    * incremental snapdiff starts
    * TSM detects one of the above conditions
    * TSM removes snapshot A
    * This forces TSM to create a new base
    * TSM creates snapshot B
    * Uses snapshot B as the new base.

    For "File skipped" or "file excluded for file set" Delete the newer TSM snapshot, rather than the older one so that the problem can be corrected and the files backed up on next run. eg
    * TSM snapshot A exists
    * incremental snapdiff starts
    * TSM snapshot B is created
    * TSM attempts to backup differences between A and B
    * Has to skip a file
    * TSM reports the issue, but deletes the snapshot B
    * operators fixes issue
    * incremental snapdiff starts
    * TSM snapshot C is created
    * TSM attempts to backup differences between A and C
    * Succeeds
    * TSM deletes snapshot A

    This will mean there will be no opportunity for data loss.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 19, 2011

    Thank you for submitting this enhancement request, the logic behind this behavior is explained in the following tech document: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21501576
    if you feel that this RFE is still valid please provide some more information about the specific use case , what are you trying to achieve and why?

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 15, 2011

    all other types of backups do this but not snapdiff.