This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Storage
Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Tivoli
Product family - Storage
Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family
I think IBM should re-consider improving subfile backups in COMPLEMENT of client side deduplication. The client side deduplication require that the data is stored and stay on a file device class stgpool.
At my customers, the SubFile function is mostly used for local/remote file servers and target PST / NSF type files. The vast majority does have files larger that 2G and stgpools is composed of a hyerarchy of tape+disks, so deduplication is not always an option.
IMHO... SubFile backup is a technology that differenciate TSM from competitors (positively) and IBM should continue improving it for large file support and large subfilecache as well.
Thanks. Pierre.
I think IBM should re-consider improving subfile backups in COMPLEMENT of client side deduplication. The client side deduplication require that the data is stored and stay on a file device class stgpool.
At my customers, the SubFile function is mostly used for local/remote file servers and target PST / NSF type files. The vast majority does have files larger that 2G and stgpools is composed of a hyerarchy of tape+disks, so deduplication is not always an option.
IMHO... SubFile backup is a technology that differenciate TSM from competitors (positively) and IBM should continue improving it for large file support and large subfilecache as well.
Thanks. Pierre.
Thank you for submitting the request. This is a recognized requirement and a solution appears to be desirable. The direction of our product
has been implementing deduplication technology for clients and servers to reduce required storage capacity that could reduce the license cost significantly.
There are currently no plans to provide requested function. No IBM commitment is made or implies as to the
eventual delivery of an acceptable solution.