This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.
Hi Uwe,
if the necessity is to run the restore command(or it's equivalent) with admin privileges, then I'm not sure what can any SUDO profile achieve, since at that point any user data/binary/configuration can be overwritten and in some cases executed. Unless the restore option to original system is taken out of equation completely, SUDO seems like exercise in futility, and this is not specific to IBM Spectrum Protect but all such products.
I'd think that the protection you may be able to achieve would be limited to protecting the password and maybe disabling the ID from interactive login. Then the users would be limited to intended use of the ID only. And again I think that this would be common for all the products.
Alternatively you may want to consider using normal backup-archive client, and then allow users to restore using their own ID, at which point they should be restricted by access control of the system(they would be only able to write to locations their user has rights to, and would only be able to restore data that are theirs).