Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 13, 2017

Easy R/W failover for a replicated node

In a ISP environment using the Node Replication feature, the R/O client failover is automated since version 7.1.1 of the ISP server. It works fine, but allows only the restore or retrieve of objects.
If the source server is unavailable for a longer period of time or got finally destroyed it might be necessary to configure the replication target as the active backup server. There might be an urgent request from database admins when log filespaces fill up.
At this time the configuration tasks for R/W access to the target replication server are not that easy and are not automated in any way: the TCPServeraddress parameter has to be updated to point to the right server. Eventually the entries for the former replication server have to be removed. An option might be the redirection of client access by updating the DNS entry if the TCPServeraddress is configured as TCPName rather than the doted address, but this might lead to access problems regarding to the password entries on the client.
This tasks have to be fulfilled on all the clients which have to be redirected - this might end up in hundreds. This is even not an option in environments where portals are used for backup configuration and the backup admin has no access to the option files.
At the time of the R/W failover, the admin has to issue the remove replnode command to break the replication relation between the two nodes on the replication source and target. Another client option could be established, allowing the client to accept the former replication target as backup server. This option would allow dedicated clients to be redirected to the replication target automatically after the remove replnode command was issued manually and processed successfully. The client, which was able to update his option file for the access to the target server, would then be allowed to redirect its backups to the former target. This implementation would also make the failback easier for clients which had R/W access to the target server.

To avoid changes to be made at the server code, this function could be connected to the replmode parameter for the node: if the client on the replication target gets an update from 'syncreceive' to 'syncsend', the client would be allowed to send data to that server. In this case only client code changes are necessary.

The requested function would make a client R/W failover and failback easier and moves this option from a theoretical one to one which could be easily practiced. It also fits in the big picture for the ISP product roadmap regarding to proposed features like metadata replication or continuous replication.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 10, 2021

    This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 14, 2017

    This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.