About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
This is essential to protect the security of a customer's Spectrum Protect Environment and other assets. Very few SP customers would want to allow direct access to IBM's FTP site and yet with increasing SP client numbers auto deployment for upgrades is a must. We have one customer with 8,800 clients to upgrade.
All other tools in the market or atleast most of them would support this use of Proxy server . I was in impression until i hit this requirement and necessity this is in Spectrum but this is Bizarre to hear that we cant use proxy . Please fix this it helps lot of accounts .
It's insane that a professional product like this can't use a proxy server ! This is the basic for a professional tool.
This request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme is aligned with the current multi-year strategy. IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting. IBM will update this request in the future.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Storage
Product - Spectrum Protect Family
Component - Spectrum Protect (Operations Center)
Operating system - Multiple
Source - None
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Storage
Product - Spectrum Protect Family
Component - Product functionality
Operating system - Multiple
Source - None