Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 6, 2011

Scripts executed on client to have parameters/environment variables

When trying to implement backup with proxy nodes (and placing all data on a single target-node), a problem arises.

Since backups with proxy nodes requires the ASNODE parameter, and in a hosted environment it is not desirable to create customer specific schedules - we need a way to handle this, which could be by intelligence in the scripts/commands being executed by the scheduler service for each proxy.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 12, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Storage
    Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Tivoli
    Product family - Storage
    Product - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Family

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 1, 2014

    In the DP for VMware vCenter plug-in we provided, an administrator can create TSM schedules on the TSM server so this capability is not lost. There is also reporting capabilities in this interface to see when backups have failed or alternatively, one could use the TSM Operations Center v7.1.1 to easily see the status of scheduled backup operations including those for DP for VMware environments. Learn more on the scheduling options with v7.1.1 here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ2ilH6Xmj0.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 4, 2011

    In a hosted scenario, we prefer to use central scheduling - that is let all backups be controlled by the TSM server. This way we can easily see if any backups at customer sites have run OK - or if any have failed.
    I have not yet checked the vCenter plugin, but if local scheduling is used in this one for doing backups, we loose the ability to check scheduled events on the TSM server in order to find out whether the backup has run or not - and if it was OK or failed. That is why it is essential to us, that we still can schedule the jobs from the TSM server.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 25, 2011

    Thanks for submitting this enhancement request, we have done a lot of work around simplifying the configuration options for VMware backups, the recent TSM for VE 6.3 have also introduced a new UI (vCenter Plugin) that can be utilized to either configure backups or monitor backup statuses. while we will continue to work on simplifying configurations and scheduling for complex environments (like the one you're describing in this RFE) we are not likely to implement a full scripting solution for the client scheduling, portions of this requirement can be met by utilizing an external scripting tool for doing the scheduling. We will keep this as an uncommitted candidate for a future release.