This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - IBM Spectrum Scale
Product - Spectrum Scale (formerly known as GPFS) - Private RFEs
Component - Product functionality
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - IBM Spectrum Scale
Product - Spectrum Scale (formerly known as GPFS) - Private RFEs
Component - V3 Product functionality
Quota provides a close approximation to this requirement. Anything closer would involve excessive overhead.
A fast, approximate df-like command is possible for a storage pool, see https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=d30c6462-68f0-4b35-9e58-92743a5c9f87&ps=25
Filesets operate on a different plane that's orthogonal to block allocation. Blocks belong to storage pools, while inode and directory subtrees belong to filesets. So when a block is allocated, this is accounted for in storage pool metadata, but not in fileset metadata. It would be theoretically possible to maintain a running total, but at the cost of substantial overhead. Essentially, this is what quota code does today. It is not clear that having a parallel mechanism that's substantially similar to that used by quota code would make sense. If something is fundamentally wrong with the way quota code does this, perhaps we should fix the quota code instead of implementing another layer.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - General Parallel File System
Product - GPFS
Component - V3 Product functionality
Operating system - Multiple
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - General Parallel File System
Product - GPFS
Component - V3
Operating system - Multiple
Creating a new RFE based on Community RFE #56781 in product GPFS.