Skip to Main Content
IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 18, 2026

Support online trim / discard of NSD freed/released blocks to optimise NVME backend performances

We are observing important degradation of GPFS read/write performances that appears to be related to the lack of online trim/discard actions for freed/released blocks on the NSDs.

Performances go back to normal once mmreclaimspace is executed and then go back to a bad state periodically depending on the amount of data stored / deleted on the FS.

mmreclaimspace does not seem to be the right answer to that problem because when it runs :

- it has to scan all the FS and perform a lot of trim/discard actions based on the specified threshold in a single run

- the impact of the mmreclaimspace running concurrently with production workloads can be really high because of that (there is no real QOS support for it)

- reducing the threshold reduces the amount of discarded blocks and just never "fix" some of them, still letting the underlying NVME having to deal with garbage collection at write time later

- it is hard / almost impossible to detect when / how often to run it as it depends of the workload write ratio that can fluctuate and the way the blocks are used across the NSDs

 

Having a sort of online block trim/discard logic (probably batching discard operations on a short time window (few/dozens seconds)) when releasing blocks on NSD of the NVME type would be in our opinion a better way to reach consistent performances and avoid large period of bad performances due to underlying garbage collection cycles with Spectrum Scale on NVME based storage.

Having such an online trim/discard logic has a per FS option, with a few knobs to tune the behaviour (batching, internal threshold, ...)  and some metrics to see what is performed in the background would help to tune GPFS to really leverage the capabilities of the underlying storage and have consistent and good performances over time.

Idea priority High