This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
We have a customer in South Africa that wants the flexibility to use 4-site cascaded GM. Primarily the use case would be to offload GM overhead to the MM target. It is supported for 3-site Metro Global Mirror so should also be ported to the 4-site topology if possible. Noted the comments about the complexity of cascaded GM but we would appreciate it if this could be considered for a future release.
Thank you for the quick response. We'll leave this under consideration. At the current time, as stated previously, most customers from CSM move towards the MT 4 site solution. So due to resources and demand this is request is currently lower in priority until more customers request the solution. But we will consider the request.
We have around 8 GDPS environments and due to our current setup, we have not considered having a MT 4site solution. Cascaded solution is what we have designed and functioning and running since years. Having a cascaded 4-site option greatly helps us in implementing our migrations quicker.
We will look into this however CSM prefers the Multi-target MM-GM 4 site solution for a reason. Multi-target setups are simpler and have a lot fewer steps necessary against the hardware in order to switch sites. Cascaded solutions require several complicated steps for some failover scenarios which means more possibilities for error. If a cascaded solution is necessary can you please provide justification why cascaded is needed and the multi-target solution does not meet your requirements.