IBM System Storage Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM System Storage products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS)

Showing 548 of 5683

OSX 10.8+ client : GPFS protocol over IP

Performance improvements over NFS3/4 and SMB2
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

Fast approximate df for filesets

mmlsfileset df calculations are slow and causes high load on a server.  A fast approximate filesetdf (alike mmlsquota) is needed.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

Increase the supported number of independent and dependent filesets x 10

10000 dependent fileset and 1000 independent filesets are not enough for some systems.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 3 Not under consideration

Multiple block sizes at the pool level

Pools could be configured with different block sizes (not metablocks) based on workload requirement.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

SNMP 64 bit counters + CIM support

Proper 64 bit counters. Obtaining correct SNMP values (E.G. for pool sizes) is not as simple as it should be.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

AFM queue control

Complete control over the order of each prefetch (analogy: priority WAN transfer queue for GPFS)
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 3 Not under consideration

Pool placement based on path

Ability to place data into a pool based on the directory location of the data.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

mmfsck -P poolname

Checking a file system with multiple pools means results in a check of the entire metadata for the file system when each pool is checked.  Not optimal.  Check individual pools instead.
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

Globally accessible and coherent cache

A cached block is cached on all nodes and hence accessible from all nodes
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 4 Not under consideration

Ability to flush / clear the cache (not to disk)

The cache on a node should be able to be cleared without unmounting and remounting the file system
almost 11 years ago in Storage Scale (formerly known as GPFS) 5 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.